6.05 #3 My reflexion

I looked at the beginning of the speeches and I would like to analyze them:

1. To get the audience's attention at the very beginning, the speaker asks the question: “What keeps us healthy and happy as we go through life?” This undoubtedly attracts attention, because then the listener wants to get an answer to the problem question. We are all interested in knowing the secret of a happy and healthy life and you want to listen further. The speaker's manner also adds interest. He has a calm speech and a smile on his face.

2. He started his speech with the story that he presented very quickly, which I liked. Yes, I want to know what happened next and how this story relates to the topic. This is a good hook. But at first you are at a loss. And here happiness and the broken arm of the sister.

But starting from 2.28, the story interested me. Since the author came up with a way to get out of the situation is very unusual.

3. I was absolutely interested. A person uses a vivid real-life story here. The speaker is frank with the audience and at the same time the story itself is unusual, connected with the edge of life and death.

4. I was just curious. A person plays a real-life story in a joking manner. A very problematic story, because a person has prosthetics.

5. The motto was beautiful and appropriate for the speech, but I was not hooked on the speech from the very beginning. Maybe it's my individual preferences. I'm not really interested in Olympic sports events, just figure skating, surfing, snowboarding, and horse riding. And I don't care much about statistics as a psychological part with its experiences and emotions of the speaker, personal stories.

I think that the motto should be used in conjunction with your personal history.

6. I was interested in listening purely from the point of view of interest in the topic. If it was a different topic, for example, the Olympic games, I would not be so interested. But I realized that the author got my attention using a reliable source of information. After all, if it was some scientist whose name we don't know, I would hardly listen.

7. This is the first time in my life that I have encountered such an extraordinary technique. The speaker gives false information, confusing the audience. I listened and thought:” Stop Wait. Isn't Los Angeles in America? Why did you say that?” And so I really want to hear explanations and listen further.

The technique is amazing. But I wouldn't take that risk, because it's shocking at first. And the trust of the audience is very important.

8. This is a great technique. The woman called all the people sitting in the audience “liars” and was going to explain why. She drew attention to the fact that this topic applies to each of us.

9. This I would definitely like to take to the arsenal. A great humorous story about procrastination that is relevant to all of us. Especially I was caught by the moment when the guy said that he got a call and said that it was the best thesis. I was surprised, because it's not real. But then he said:”This did not happen.” I laughed very loudly, as did the audience. This piqued my interest because the man was using a supposed situation that didn't happen in the end.

10. The man attracted the attention of a good rhetorical question. I lowered my score only because it didn't surprise me very much. I even knew that he would say that it is impossible to do it always, because it depends on the personal traits of the person and his interests.

11. I liked how beautifully the author introduced the concept of voice using colorful comparisons. But it didn't make a strong impression on me.

12. Here again using the technique of personal history. I lowered my rating because this technique has already been used. But I think the story is very specific. It will be of interest to researchers, professors, but hardly to everyone.

13. The Appeal to the audience has already been met but does not cease to please. After all, this applies to our personal feelings: “How interesting you are…” And humor is added to this.

14. I liked the beginning. The girl uses a personal concept of what marriage should be and a personal humorous story that is very close to the adult audience. She even sang a little song.

15. The girl uses statistics and problem history. We are all interested in this topic because we are concerned about our health and do not want problems with it.

But the hook was the unexpected end of the beginning. We want to find out how childhood trauma can be so destructive, affect the entire immune system, and even provoke lung cancer.

16. I have already mentioned this technique. This is a bright and problematic issue:”Could you forgive the murderer of a family member? But one person did…” Of course I want to know why!

17. It uses a life story with humorous overtones. It's not interesting at first, but then it's intriguing.

18. The presentation begins with what the person is saying: "Hi, I want to show you thirty seconds of the best day of my life.” It becomes incredibly interesting, and what does a person consider the best? What should happen to call this day like this? What will this story be about? This is a beginning based on personal experience.

19. Here we use the familiar technique of a vivid life story. Despite the fact that many proposals on how to blow up the market are illegal or invalid, people still become interested in how to do it. Did the heroes of history do it?

20. This technique after viewing the above already seems very banal, despite the fact that the question is addressed to the audience and concerns it very much.

21. The opening struck me as important because you can guess what it will be about leadership qualities. This topic is important not only for me but also for any teacher. Of all the performances, this is the only one that uses the example of famous people who have reached heights. It's catchy.