1) CHALLENGE
How much time do you spend with your relatives? Do you know all about them? And do you call your aunts and uncles often?
My family is very large. I have three aunts and one uncle. We used to live a few doors away from each other. We hardly see each other now.
For me family means a lot and I have long wanted to communicate closely with relatives but I was afraid or did not find the time. During the coronavirus period many people stay at home like my aunts and uncle and I thought this was a great chance to contact them.
First, I called my aunt Vika and tried to find common topics with her. It turned out that we have something to talk about. In our spare time, we discussed interesting articles on psychology and travel with her.
I also establish a relationship with my other aunt and often sit with her daughter.
It was hard for me because my parents don't get along with relatives and for this reason we try not to talk. I was afraid that we would not establish relations, but it turned out that my relatives want to communicate with me and I even help my aunt in learning English.
In the future I want to organize a joint holiday because it's been so long since we had a family holiday together with our grandparents. I have told you my story of family rapprochement and I want you to remember that there is nothing more precious than family. Communicate with your relatives while you can.
***
2) P.105 - 111
Analysis of the speech
I chose the first speech for analysis.
There is an attention getter in the form of a question: "Have you ever been to London?"
The link "If you have..." is present. I see a good introduction.
Here there is a statement and then goes its explanation, the person tells us what the London eye is.
Unfortunately, the speech preview was skipped.
The first part of the body lacks specifics and details. I would add, in what specific films and broadcasts this information was mentioned. This would give the speaker more credibility.
I can't follow the logic of the story. If we see how the introduction moves smoothly to the body, then I don't see a connection between the two parts of the body. First we talk about one thing, and then abruptly and without a smooth transition about the other.
I liked that there is a conclusion here. A person briefly talks about what the sights are, sums it up and designates it with a specific cliche. But it would be better if he briefly listed what he said above and mentioned concrete attractions.
3) The last speech was mine and I will write a full analysis of it later.
4) It is a pity that the course of social psychology has ended. I learned a lot of new and interesting things.
How much time do you spend with your relatives? Do you know all about them? And do you call your aunts and uncles often?
My family is very large. I have three aunts and one uncle. We used to live a few doors away from each other. We hardly see each other now.
For me family means a lot and I have long wanted to communicate closely with relatives but I was afraid or did not find the time. During the coronavirus period many people stay at home like my aunts and uncle and I thought this was a great chance to contact them.
First, I called my aunt Vika and tried to find common topics with her. It turned out that we have something to talk about. In our spare time, we discussed interesting articles on psychology and travel with her.
I also establish a relationship with my other aunt and often sit with her daughter.
It was hard for me because my parents don't get along with relatives and for this reason we try not to talk. I was afraid that we would not establish relations, but it turned out that my relatives want to communicate with me and I even help my aunt in learning English.
In the future I want to organize a joint holiday because it's been so long since we had a family holiday together with our grandparents. I have told you my story of family rapprochement and I want you to remember that there is nothing more precious than family. Communicate with your relatives while you can.
***
2) P.105 - 111
Analysis of the speech
I chose the first speech for analysis.
There is an attention getter in the form of a question: "Have you ever been to London?"
The link "If you have..." is present. I see a good introduction.
Here there is a statement and then goes its explanation, the person tells us what the London eye is.
Unfortunately, the speech preview was skipped.
The first part of the body lacks specifics and details. I would add, in what specific films and broadcasts this information was mentioned. This would give the speaker more credibility.
I can't follow the logic of the story. If we see how the introduction moves smoothly to the body, then I don't see a connection between the two parts of the body. First we talk about one thing, and then abruptly and without a smooth transition about the other.
I liked that there is a conclusion here. A person briefly talks about what the sights are, sums it up and designates it with a specific cliche. But it would be better if he briefly listed what he said above and mentioned concrete attractions.
3) The last speech was mine and I will write a full analysis of it later.
4) It is a pity that the course of social psychology has ended. I learned a lot of new and interesting things.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий